Retention contribution
In-store and online customer view
Quarter-on-quarter lifecycle lift
Previously anonymous traffic
Channel performance
Where the spend actually moved.
Overview
THE CHALLENGE
The brand was operating with a lifecycle stack built for a smaller, single-region business. Deliverability had drifted in the international market, lapsed segments were going dark, and new-versus-returning behaviour was being collapsed into one undifferentiated audience. The retention programme was sending volume but not generating the incremental contribution the leadership team needed.
The harder problem sat underneath. A meaningful share of revenue came through physical stores, but the in-store transaction never returned to the customer record. That meant a returning in-store buyer would be re-marketed as a prospect online, and the team had no honest read on lifetime value. Acquisition decisions were being made against a partial picture.
The measurement layer made the problem worse. Anonymous traffic was growing as browser-side signal degraded, and the team had no reliable way to attribute online behaviour back to known customers. Retention, measurement and omnichannel had to be solved as one programme, not three.
THE APPROACH
How the engagement was structured.
We started with the unglamorous work. Email deliverability in the international region was diagnosed and rebuilt from sender reputation upward, with list hygiene, suppression discipline and warming sequences that restored the inbox before any creative work mattered. Lifecycle flows were then segmented on new-versus-returning logic so first-time buyers, repeat customers and lapsed audiences were treated as distinct cohorts with distinct intent.
From there the engagement expanded into a full retention retainer. We rebuilt the core lifecycle journeys end to end: welcome, browse, cart, post-purchase, replenishment, win-back, with behaviour-led triggers and creative that reflected where the customer actually was in their relationship with the brand. Each flow was tied to a clear outcome rather than an open rate, and the cadence calendar was rebuilt against contribution rather than send volume.
Offline was brought into the same system. Point-of-sale was integrated so in-store transactions wrote back to the customer record, which meant lifecycle attributes finally reflected the customer's full behaviour across stores and online. A returning in-store buyer was recognised as such the next time they opened an email, and lifetime value calculations stopped underselling the most loyal segment of the file.
The measurement layer was rebuilt in parallel. Server-side tracking surfaced previously anonymous traffic and tied it back to known customers wherever consent allowed, which sharpened the signal feeding into both lifecycle and paid channels. Omnichannel splits were then used to brief creative, sequence offers and prioritise audiences against where real revenue was being earned.
SIR. · IN THE ROOM
Inside the engagement.
The working moments behind the numbers.
← Drag or scroll horizontally
THE OUTCOME
Retention shifted from a back-of-house channel into a genuine contributor to revenue. New-versus-returning splits gave the merchandising and trading teams a clean read on which cohorts were responding to which stories, and lapsed re-engagement kept building quarter on quarter as the segmentation matured.
The omnichannel work re-rated the value of the most loyal customers. With in-store revenue attributed to the lifecycle programme, lifetime value calculations finally reflected reality, and acquisition decisions were briefed against a fuller picture of contribution. Conversion lifted on the journeys where store and online behaviour had previously been working against each other.
The partnership has run across multiple peak periods and product launches, with the lifecycle, measurement and omnichannel layers now operating as one connected system rather than three disconnected workstreams.
MORE CLIENT STORIES











